Smith And Wesson Forums banner

Smith & Wesson Model 32 TERRIER (.38 S&W)

56K views 61 replies 22 participants last post by  Squiggs  
#1 ·
The S&W Model 32 Terrier is a small frame revolver in .38 S&W. It was manufactured from 1936 to 1974. They resemble the more common Model 36 Chief's Special. The primary difference is that the M32 is chambered for the older .38 S&W cartridge rather than the more common and more powerful .38 Special chambering of the Model 36. The Terrier was originally built on the I-Frame but later models (32-1) were built on the J-Frame beginning in 1961 after S&W discontinued the I-Frame.

Does anyone have the S&W Model 32 (I-Frame) or the S&W Model 32-1 (J-Frame)?
 
#19 ·
i apologize for the shaky pic hosting! i am trying to figure out a new method. here is the other side:
View attachment 339337
Beautiful example of the "38 Terrier" Post War Transitional I frame 6 screw model!
Almost as hard to find as the Pre War Model and the only difference is yours has the post war sliding bar hammer block safety.
 
#4 ·
#22 · (Edited)
good grief! i am old and tired! i don't know how i posted the blue model 30 pics, and i can't figure out how to delete them! SO! there are pics of both sides of a sweet old flatlatch model 30 that have absolutely no relation to what we are talking about!

here is the other side of the nickel terrier (....maybe!):
Image
That nickle gun is a Model of 1953 "NEW" I frame, 4 screw, an early one with the old hammer style. It's a true Pre Model 32.
 
#10 ·
I don't have an S&W .38 S&W firearm. Haven't ever had the need for one and not so sure I need one now.
 
#14 ·
:) NEED???
The earlier I-Frame "Terrier" models are noticeably more compact than the J-Frame models - especially with the older abbreviated grip panels. Years ago...I had a well-worn I-Frame Terrier with the older grips that I used for pocket-carry - loaded with my own "stout" WC and SWC handloads. You could immediately tell the difference between the weight and bulk of it in the pocket when compared to my Bangor-Punta M-36.

When I switched over to carrying sub-compact 9mms around, I got talked out of it.....and sorely regret letting it go. The .38 S&W Terriers in years past could be acquired cheaper than the similar .38 Special snubs, but not so these days.

I've never bought a box of factory .38 S&W - too puny. Factory loads are still kept that way because of the many no-name top-break revolvers floating around. Handloading a Terrier up to .38 Special ballistics is the way to go. I have the proper .360" Ideal/Lyman 155gr. SWC bullet mould for it. If you get a Terrier, I'll lend it to you.
 
#25 ·
I'm pretty sure this is a Terrier because it says so on the box..:)

View attachment 339413
Another scarce nickel 38 Terrier Post War Transitional I Frame, 6 screw with pre war type Service (round top) grips, and the box!

From that serial # it most likely shipped early Nov. 1950.

Those nickel guns can look like new with a little Mother's Mag Wheel polish while watching the news.
 
#13 ·
Here is my 32-1. I own four revolvers chambered in 38 s&w. They range from a 38 da to the 32-1. I load some 125swc that are
A little faster than the 146 factory loads. The BSR with my 200gr bullets is a ball to shoot spinners with. Here is a pic of my
snub and some of hand loads. The loads are 125, 146, and the 200 bullets. If you try one of these Robert I'll predict you'll keep it. I threw in a pic of the pre war BSR in 38s&w. Cliff
 
#26 ·
View attachment 339423 Here is my 32-1. I own four revolvers chambered in 38 s&w. They range from a 38 da to the 32-1. I load some 125swc that are
A little faster than the 146 factory loads. The BSR with my 200gr bullets is a ball to shoot spinners with. Here is a pic of my
snub and some of hand loads. The loads are 125, 146, and the 200 bullets. If you try one of these Robert I'll predict you'll keep it. I threw in a pic of the pre war BSR in 38s&w. Cliff
That's a like new J frame post 1968, probably with the R serial # prefix.
 
#28 ·
#29 ·
What year would be associated with Serial No. 68933?
 
#35 ·
Robert, the improved I frame was introduced in 1953 around the same time the first J frame Chiefs Specials known as the Baby Chiefs due to the grip frame being the same as an I frame. Jim has a very good writeup on the progression in the SCSW4th.

As far as what is sought after, most of the 32 HE's are about the same through this period. However, there were some target Regulation Police revolvers made after the war from pre-war parts and they are probably the most sought after I frames after the Bekearts. In the J frames, the Baby Chiefs are sought after and the very early ones, especially in nickel, are highly valuable. I'm sure Jim has a more refined perspective and clearly knows more than I do on this subject.
 
#36 ·
Then, is the following correct?

1936 to 1953 S&W Terrier (I-Frame)
1953 to 1961 S&W Terrier (I-Frame Improved)
1961 to 1974 S&W 32-1 (J-Frame)

What did they do the I-Frame to improve it or was it just a move to save money in the manufacture of it?

What are the best features of these 3 periods of manufacture and which one is the most desirable?
 
#37 ·
Your timeline looks correct to me. The Improved I frame was a switch from a flat mainspring to the coiled mainspring. Your last questions have subjective answers depending on a lot of factors but mainly flat mainspring vs. coiled mainspring and I frame vs. J frame if you are focusing on shooting the gun. From a collectability standpoint, IMO, the early guns are more desirable because there are fewer of them.
 
#38 ·
Your timeline looks correct to me. The Improved I frame was a switch from a flat mainspring to the coiled mainspring. Your last questions have subjective answers depending on a lot of factors but mainly flat mainspring vs. coiled mainspring and I frame vs. J frame if you are focusing on shooting the gun. From a collectability standpoint, IMO, the early guns are more desirable because there are fewer of them.
Thank you. That is very good information for me.
 
#39 ·
What 2" inch barreled revolver did S&W make in the .32 S&W Long cartridge?
 
#41 ·
All of this information is making my head hurt. There's just too much to learn and not enough time to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cliff and Troll