Smith And Wesson Forums banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
656 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Which do you prefer on this 1940 HD? Originally it had Magnas but with the price of the pre-wat stocks that ain’t gonna happen for this weary and poorly refinished veteran. I had some stocks of polished buffalo horn on it and the black finish looks good with the nickel. But I generally prefer checkering and I usually go with factory wood on my S&Ws. I just picked up these 1953 or so Magnas from member john horn. So here are photos of the gun with both stocks. Which do you like best?





 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,488 Posts
The problem Sax, with putting post war stocks on a prewar gun is the length of the grip frame.... there's usually a bit of the frame sticking out from under the grips.... I find this annoying....

Perhaps you might be better served with a set of Pre-war Repop Service Type stocks from North Carolina Ordinance, or even cheaper are their 1917 stocks which you could inlet a medallion into yourself.....

http://www.gungrip.com/items_031__page0.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
656 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Both sets match the frame perfectly. I have had that trouble with earlier guns, from the 1920s, but my HD and 1926 from 1940 and 1938 respectively wear post war stocks that fit just fine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,121 Posts
Hey, SP
Two things:
1) The buffalo horn set wins hands-down, IMHO.
2) Those postwar magnas are transitionals, and worth some $$$...hence
the nice fit on the prewar gun.
Good going!
Don
hpzl;n;
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
829 Posts
The black Buffalo horn looks better IMO. Nice looking workhorse.
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top