This is anecdotal but when I see a mechanism as lightly engineered internally, and then see this happen on the range I tend to pay attention.
I had a student show up at CCH class with one these brand new and after three shots it jammed so completely we could rack it to make it safe. We fired the cartridge in the chamber, and gave the student a replacement gun to qualify with. They went back to the gun shop with it.
I don't personally recommend the EZ platform. Stick with the regular M&P in full size, compact or Shield in version 1.0 or 2.0 and you'll more likely have a reliable self defense firearm.
Smith and Wesson has practiced "brand pollution" for years - marketing what I consider to be inferior firearms and excellent firearms under the same basic branding. Unfortunately, things vary from model to model, and from individual firearm to the next coming off the line.
I had a student show up at CCH class with one these brand new and after three shots it jammed so completely we could rack it to make it safe. We fired the cartridge in the chamber, and gave the student a replacement gun to qualify with. They went back to the gun shop with it.
I don't personally recommend the EZ platform. Stick with the regular M&P in full size, compact or Shield in version 1.0 or 2.0 and you'll more likely have a reliable self defense firearm.
Smith and Wesson has practiced "brand pollution" for years - marketing what I consider to be inferior firearms and excellent firearms under the same basic branding. Unfortunately, things vary from model to model, and from individual firearm to the next coming off the line.