I agree with you wholeheartedly. Unless, the unfluted cylinder is designed so that the bolt cuts are not over each chamber. Therefore making the unfluted-ness necessary. I talked to David Clements about this very issue when he was building my 5 shot 45 that "can" be loaded to near 454 levels.xtimberman said:They are both mighty handsome looking! It's nice to have 'em both, but I'd shoot the cylinder that lines up best with the bore and has the least Bbl./Cyl. gap without binding.
Contrary to what some folks think, unfluted cylinders on 6-shooters like Rugers and Colts aren't any stronger than the fluted ones. The cylinder weak spots are the bolt cuts over each cylinder, and they are the same for fluted or unfluted. Unfluted cylinders do add some weight and may theoretically reduce the recoil of a given load because of that extra weight.
xtm
...a worthy 3 cents to add! I have no disagreement with you, Henry!Henry Bowman said:I agree with you wholeheartedly. Unless, the unfluted cylinder is designed so that the bolt cuts are not over each chamber. Therefore making the unfluted-ness necessary. I talked to David Clements about this very issue when he was building my 5 shot 45 that "can" be loaded to near 454 levels.
My 3 cents FWIW...and I am not trying to be controversial.
The actual process of mechanically making the bolt cuts doesn't weaken the cylinder. It's just that the thin metal remaining between the deepest part of the cuts and the bored cylinders are the weak spots. I have seen a revolver cylinder that was fired with overloaded cartridges with several bulges up into the cuts - where the fired cases had to be pounded out. He was a lucky fellow, IMO, because the whole cylinder could've split with catastrophic results. He was shooting handloads that some fellow at his office had given him.Possum said:I hope those cylinder stop cuts don't weaken my 8 shot cylinder enough to make it crack.