Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree10Likes
  • 2 Post By MandPNewscom
  • 4 Post By mmitch
  • 1 Post By Hellbent
  • 1 Post By FlaRon
  • 2 Post By spud_.308

Thread: Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Member #
    12627
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    14
    Liked
    30 times

    Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

    Special THANK YOU to DGM33 for letting us borrow his Shield for the photo shoot. :bow:

    Photographing the M&P Shield has really made me reconsider what I carry daily, which has been the S&W M&P 9 compact. When I am not carrying the 9c, I carry the Sig Sauer P238 Equinox in my pocket. This author thought it would be fun to compare the three guns using photography. It is not often that I consider changing carry guns because it requires getting used to a new gun, which takes a lot of time, energy, training and money to use it effectively. I would equate it to test driving a new car, it just feels weird when you first get behind the wheel.

    The Shield is hot right now and for good reason. For the money, it is one of the smallest, most affordable sub-compact 9mm’s on the market. I see one in my future… Now for the porn.






















    Link for my review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison S&W
    WendyZXZ and bluefoxjc like this.

  2. #2
    Site Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    639
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Eastern Tenessee, VOL's Country
    Posts
    18,766
    Liked
    26391 times
    Great thread you created. That's an excellent way to compare them literally side by side.
    The differences are pretty substantial once you see the parts placed next to each other.
    Your photography is very good too, and that helps a lot. Thanks for the lessons.

    Regards,
    Gearchecker
    Teach them the truth, and let them sort thru the cobwebs of liberalism that have infested their minds.
    When the time comes that I don't want a new gun, call the undertaker!
    When they come for your guns, give them the ammo first!
    .45 ACP, Because shooting twice is just plain silly!




    http://www.corneredcat.com
    http://www.takdriver.com


  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Member #
    88
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Twangtown
    Posts
    5,899
    Liked
    8370 times
    M,

    Welcome!

    For those of us who are primarily steel and wood types. I, for one, have very little interest in polymer pistols. I am not averse to learning, however, but it would be er, ...considerate if you would, at the very least caption your photographs. If I knew what I was seeing and which was which I might be motivated to generate a little interest in your efforts.

    Mike
    Last edited by mmitch; 04-13-2013 at 08:35 PM.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    SmithAndWessonForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Supporting Member
    Member #
    12187
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,720
    Liked
    6374 times
    Great pictures! But also being somewhat polymer challenged, what qualities other than size makes you want to switch? Are the handling characteristics that much different? I'm not really excited over polymer guns but always willing to learn something.
    spud_.308 likes this.
    Duane

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Member #
    65
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Western Mass
    Posts
    18,692
    Liked
    14015 times
    Polymer (plastic) pistols may not interest me much, but for me, both shooting and carry........ they are the way to go, without a doubt. I have an injured left shoulder, that makes shooting two-handed difficult.....if not impossible. I traded my heavy steel Ruger MK.III for the new Ruger SR22 plastic .22 pistol. It's smaller, lighter, and much easier to handle for me.....one handed. Now, I can enjoy shooting .22's again. I need to find a good leather IWB holster for it, though. I also have lighter .22 rifles, but I cannot hold the fore end steady.

    The S&W M-17-4 K22, and those rifles need to be bench rested, for me to hit fairly well.......but, because of the plastic pistol, I am able to handle it. It's time for me to give the S&W Shield a serious look!

    Thanks for the report. Bob
    When you want the BEST! Bob

  7. #6
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    8733
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Ashford, AL
    Posts
    18,191
    Liked
    41145 times
    to the forums from the Wiregrass!
    Guy

    S&WCA #2629 | Ex-Navy Vietnam Vet. / Submariner | NRA Member | S&W Historical Foundation


  8. #7
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    5581
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The Villages
    Posts
    7,132
    Liked
    19334 times

    Cool

    Welcome to the forum from sunny Florida.

    Nice photos to show the comparison of the two firearms.

    The two are very close in size and if given the choice I would go for the M&P 9C.

    The slightly longer barrel is no problem to conceal and the slightly thicker grip (I have large hands) and added round count is a plus for me.

    My primary EDC is a Glock 23 carried AIWB. I tried the Glock 27 however the grip was to short for me and the 23 with long grip and added round count again is a plus.

    Name:  photo.jpg
Views: 31334
Size:  96.4 KB
    click image to enlarge....

    Regards,

    FlaRon

    Name:  State_Flag.jpg
Views: 5903
Size:  89.9 KB
    Wiregrassguy likes this.
    "Unapologetically American"

    "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty".
    Thomas Jefferson

    "Blessed be the Lord my strength,which teacheth my hands to war,and my fingers to fight". Psalm 144:1

    "Violence is seldom the answer, but when it is the answer it is the only answer". T.Larkin

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Member #
    7899
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Poconos
    Posts
    3,011
    Liked
    3887 times
    Hi & welcome to the forums.
    I'm polymer savvy & liked the pictoral, but woulda appreciated descriptions & differences too. So I'll help ya out a little & clarify for them old time wheel gunners only.
    Without going into a full blown review ... summary: Mag capacity: Double(10) Vs. single stack(7 or 8) . Barrel: 3.5" Vs. 3.1" Frame 1.2" Vs. .95" Weight 21.7 oz. Vs. 19 oz.
    I have a Shield .40 on my wtb list, but as it's been said here before "they're as scarce as hens teeth." Don't let us picky buggers scare ya off after just your 2nd post & please keep up with the pics.
    mmitch and Hellbent like this.
    “The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.”
    "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."
    Pennsylvania Constitution; article 1 section 21
    Be Blessed, spud.308

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Member #
    8175
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    L.A. (lower Arkansas)
    Posts
    329
    Liked
    94 times
    I had considered a Shield but decided it was too big for pocket carry and offered no real advantage IWB over 1/2 dozen other pistols. My Glock 26 carries IWB just as well as the Shield. I ended up buying a Kahr Pm-9 that will pocket carry and so far has been trouble free. I wanted something I could just drop in my front pocket for those quick unplanned trips to town, wanted something I didn't have to dress around.

  11. #10
    Junior Member
    Member #
    10201
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Clayton Ohio
    Posts
    19
    Liked
    31 times
    Wonderful pictures,I am not a Tupperware guy at all,full range of Colt and S & W revovlers and 1911's. My first carry is a S & W 559. That said,just bought the 9mm Shield.The 559 has found a home in the safe.The Shield handles and carries so comfortable,probably will never go plastic except for this one.


 

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. K frame comparison
    By kweeksdraw in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-22-2013, 11:34 AM
  2. M&p shield shooting review
    By MrColionNoir in forum S&W Semi-Auto Pistols Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-10-2013, 07:42 PM
  3. M&p shield review: Iphone like buzz, but does it deliver?
    By MrColionNoir in forum S&W Semi-Auto Pistols Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 08-17-2012, 02:47 PM
  4. N-Frame comparison
    By Triplelock in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-30-2012, 12:51 PM
  5. The Ultimate Comparison
    By David Lapell in forum The Armory
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-03-2011, 05:35 PM

Search tags for this page

m&p 9c

,

m&p 9c review

,

m&p 9c vs shield

,
m&p compact vs shield
,
m&p shield vs compact
,
m&p shield vs m&p 9c
,
m&p shield vs m&p compact
,
m&p9c vs shield
,
s&w m&p 9c review
,
smith and wesson m&p 9c vs shield
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread

Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
SmithandWessonForums.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson. We are an enthusiast site and fans of Smith & Wesson Firearms. To visit the official Smith & Wesson site, click here: Smith-Wesson.com.