Criminal Confiscation of Firearms
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree49Likes

Thread: Criminal Confiscation of Firearms

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Member #
    16322
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    5,832
    Liked
    8592 times

    Lightbulb Criminal Confiscation of Firearms

    The reasons why anti-2nd Amendment sentiment is always directed at the law abiding citizens in an effort to control the criminal use of firearms is because the criminal use of firearms can only be obtained by the complete confiscation of all firearms from the American public.
    ROBERT @ OKC USA




    He who questions much learns much. - Frances Bacon
    There was a time when men were kind and their words were inviting. - Les Miserables
    Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. - Thomas Jefferson
    If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
    80% of success is showing up. - Woody Allen

    SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM.
    SPES MEA IN DEO EST.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Member #
    43541
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    391
    Liked
    1147 times
    Or at least that's the trope that's used.

    Here, I'll fix that for ya' with the real reason:

    The reasons why anti-2nd Amendment sentiment is always directed at the law abiding citizens in an effort to control the people is because the people's ownership of firearms is a threat to the expanding power structure which can only be solved by the complete confiscation of all firearms from the American public.

    "The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." -A.E. van Vogt

  3. #3
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    8537
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Southwest Iowa
    Posts
    10,043
    Liked
    20351 times
    It does no good to direct anti-2nd Amendment sentiment to the criminal element as it is a waste of time so that leaves only the law abiding element as the target. Many of them (the law abiding element)
    are too stupid to understand what is going on and/or too busy counting their "likes" on facebook.

    What's that quote? All it takes for evil to survive is for good people to do nothing. All it takes to get rid of the crooks in our government is for good people to vote them out. The 2016 election may have saved this nation; the 2020 elections will let us know if we were successful.
    NWDave, Injunbro, Bob K and 3 others like this.

    Duty then is the sublimest word in the English language. You should do your duty in all things. You can never do more, you should never wish to do less

    Robert E. Lee

  4. Remove Advertisements
    SmithAndWessonForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Member #
    28737
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Jax, Fla
    Posts
    1,504
    Liked
    4284 times
    In other words, when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
    Curt360, klagz13, Injunbro and 2 others like this.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Member #
    6122
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    OH-IO
    Posts
    3,452
    Liked
    8811 times
    Quote Originally Posted by MWAG View Post
    In other words, when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
    Like in Venezuela and Mexico.
    Two very safe and happy gun-less countries.
    Rule3, Injunbro, legelegel and 2 others like this.
    ~Jerry | https://www.buckeyefirearms.org | http://orpa.net
    Life Member https://www.dav.org/ | NRA Distinguished

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1419
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,050
    Liked
    9854 times
    I know I am guilty of crafting run-on sentences, but I am the dim bulb on this one? Are you addressing supply as a rationale for prohibition? Prohibition for its own sake? Or what?
    legelegel likes this.

  8. #7
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    5427
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC, USA
    Posts
    6,983
    Liked
    19679 times
    Now that you understand the objective of basically all 22,000 Second Amendment infringing laws in this country, join with your state's firearms rights group to start dismantling them one at a time.

    The effort that would help the nation most right now would recognize that politicians are supporting school shooters nationwide by protecting them when they attack schools. Isn't that exactly what happens when you stop the law abiding and trained staff and citizens from defending themselves? This was a decision by politicians at local, state and Federal level starting with the supposed "Gun Free School Zones Act" which has established well marked and identified massacre zones where school attackers know they are protected from anyone lawful that would stop them.

    Tell politicians it really doesn't matter what they intended with these ill conceived prohibition laws. The effect is well understood, and the impact has to be reversed now.

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...-are-dangerous

    Armed teachers that can defend our most precious children are not dangerous. We know that for a fact in the 22 states that already permit armed school staff.

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/john...chool-shooters

    Not a single school attack has been directed at a school full of children during normal school operating hours in states that permit armed staff.

    https://crimeresearch.org/2019/05/ma...-school-hours/

    The study to share with your politicians (the ones that are protecting the school shooters and enabling a rapid increase in the incidence of these attacks) is here:

    http://ssrn.com/abstract=3377801

    The raw data is available for any researcher to use to check the validity of John Lott's work here:

    https://crimeresearch.org/wp-content...90418.xlsx.zip

    Now get busy and tell politicians to correct their ill conceived and dangerous actions which are protecting school shooters and putting our precious children in danger.

    The legacy media is finally figuring out that they are part of the problem when they glorify the name of school attackers. Even with that, they cannot control themselves to the point of stopping. NPR insisted on naming them this morning. Of course, they still haven't connected with the fact that dwelling on all the chaos and weeping victims motivates future school attackers.

    The politically correct school administrations have yet to realize that telling staff and children to hide and cower will not stop the attacks. In the last ones, brave students ignored bad advice, and actively resisted to stop the attacks, tragically dying in the process of saving dozens of lives and injuries to others.

    So now it's time to take on the politicians and tell them to drop the delusions and let responsible defenders save lives. Using guns if necessary, but stopping evil in the process.

    After all, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."
    Last edited by mrerick; 05-08-2019 at 05:48 PM.
    MWAG, delcrossv, Bullshot and 4 others like this.
    Cheers! Marc


    Check out my Gun Rights BLOG at: http://skilledshot.wordpress.com
    accipere facile, sed sumite! - Take it easy, but take it!
    NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol; Personal Protection Inside and Outside the Home; Rifle; Reloading: Chief RSO
    NC DOJ Concealed Carry Instructor; Appointed Member North Carolina Criminal Justice Information Network

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Member #
    19114
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Northwestern Pa.
    Posts
    10,692
    Liked
    55434 times
    The message sent when a lot of the students and their parents walked out on a supposed vigil that turned political/anti-gun was a good one. I think the public is seeing how stupid/ineffective the lefts ideas are and that they try to capitalize on every tragedy that occurs..if it suits their agenda. But, more needs to be done to stand up for our rights and to tell the other Americans that they have NO right to limit or restrict your rights concerning the right to own firearms and defend yourself.
    Bullshot, lawdog, Injunbro and 1 others like this.
    I keep a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'!

    "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself."
    George Washington


  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Member #
    15173
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    2,508
    Liked
    4686 times
    The federal government passes law after law and then selectively enforces them. They handicap small businesses with laws, then the large companies break those laws with impunity because the feds don’t want to take on big companies for the most part. An example is job discrimination laws concerning age. Other examples include environmental regulations.
    The point is will they enforce those gun control laws. Connecticut outlawed “ assault weapons” after Sandy Hook and only a few thousand were turned in. Hundreds of thousands are still in the hands of Connecticut citizens. They aren’t going after the guns but will ream anyone caught with one.
    But in times of emergency as the Boston Bombing they searched homes under threat of force without warrants.
    Will it happen if the feds outlaws firearms?
    If they - law enforcement - are met with the same force they threaten with - battle rifles with extended magazines - they will take casualties confiscating firearms.
    Will that stop gun confiscation? Will that stop honest citizens being made felons by the stroke of a pen?
    We don’t want to find out.
    The majority of the people do not want the problems gun confiscation will cause but the elitists don’t care.
    All I can tell you is my new OKLAHOMA Representative Kendra Horn is a huge flake when it comes to gun control. She will not commit to a position when confronted by pro 2A citizens but you can surely count on her voting for gun control..
    She is gonna get gone in the next election.
    Your elected representative is where the battle exists now, we don’t want gun fights at our homes resisting gun confiscation.
    Injunbro and legelegel like this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1419
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,050
    Liked
    9854 times
    Like most "revolutions" it will be more evolution. The Metropolitan Police of London England annually receives over a thousand surrendered guns every year. Uncle Fred died and guess what we found...... It won't get here in most of our lifetimes. The stage has yet to be set nationally, in certain states they have been trying yes. Are there people convinced nearly all privately held guns are bad, of course. All true, but we have a lot of fight left. The following generations, who knows.
    legelegel likes this.


 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-01-2018, 01:36 PM
  2. Firearms Safety vs. Safety in Firearms
    By legelegel in forum CCW Forum - Gun Control - State Laws
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-01-2018, 02:16 PM
  3. Criminal car customizations!
    By Blackcloud2 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-08-2011, 07:26 PM
  4. Incredible form of concealment by a criminal!
    By Blackcloud2 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-18-2011, 10:46 PM
  5. S&W's in Criminal Minds
    By ladder13 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2010, 01:51 PM
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
SmithandWessonForums.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson. We are an enthusiast site and fans of Smith & Wesson Firearms. To visit the official Smith & Wesson site, click here: Smith-Wesson.com.