+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Member
    Member #
    2001
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Genesee County, MI
    Posts
    46
    Liked
    0 times

    I brought home "The Book" today..disappointed (Page 2)

    Today I brought home a Model 60 (dash 3) Ladysmith in 38 special caliber, and is a pre-lock gun. Serial number BDE974x. I was wondering what "options" make a gun a Ladysmith as opposed to the standard model 60? Also wondering if these guns are safe to shoot "Plus P" ammo? And when it was shipped from the factory? From what I can guess, I am not sure these are the original grips, they have a number stamped in them, but does not match any other number on the gun.



  2. #2
    Guest

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today

    real nice it looks like a mid 80s gun & instead of a satin finish it has the glassbead finish.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Member #
    9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rainbow Valley Az. {SE of Buckeye}
    Posts
    7,451
    Liked
    1763 times

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today

    The grips are supposed to be a tad different, designed for a woman. I don't think the S&W women's grip engineers had the Russian women's swim team in mind with them. As John said, the finish is what they call "frosted",,, catchy in a marketing way I guess. Maybe if I got in touch with my feminine side I would understand it, but that ain't gonna happen
    Down in the 'ammo' section there is a sticky on a +Ps. It is well written and well worth the time it takes to read it.
    My friends call me 'Mick'
    Save the Second Amendment, take a kid shooting!

  4. #4
    Member
    Member #
    2001
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Genesee County, MI
    Posts
    46
    Liked
    0 times

    regarding +P's

    That was a very good read in the ammo section regarding +P's. It basically told me what I already suspected, but being new to "J" frames I didn't want to take any chances, my 642 clearly states +P rated and this model 60 although seemingly built way more solid makes no mention of it.

  5. #5
    Member
    Member #
    2001
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Genesee County, MI
    Posts
    46
    Liked
    0 times

    ...but this dosn't make sense?

    From the internet I found this, and my 60-3 "Ladysmith" apparently did not exsist until 60-6...still confused.
    "Here's what the book says;
    60(1965); Introduction of the first SS revolver.
    1968; Delete the diamond grips
    1969; Begin R serial numbers.
    60-1 (1972); 3" sq. butt heavy barrel version; limited production of 171 in a serial range of R56962-R57239.
    1982; Delet pinned barrel.
    1986; Special run of model60 with adj. rear sight.
    60-2 (1987); Per Robert Vivas, expert onNYCPD firearms, all aproximately 2500 of this variation were originally DAO with 2" barrels possibly for the NYCPD. It is believed that all were returned to S&W and resold, probably after conversion to traditional SA/DA operation, and at least some rebarreled to 3".
    60-3 (1988); New yoke retention system.
    60-4 (1990); Limited production of target model with full underlug and new yoke retention system.
    60-5 (1990); DA only for NYCPD and new yoke retention system.
    60-6 (1989); LadySmith version introduced. Introduction at LDY0045 (possibly starting at LDY0001).
    60-7 (1990); New sight width increase to 1/8", heat treated package.
    60-8 (1990); New sight width for NYCPD, heat treated package.
    1992; Discontinue 3" barrel; continue with 2" only on LS.
    1994; Rosewood laminate grips on LadySmith.
    1994; Change extractor; introduce Uncle Mike's synthetic grips.
    60-9 (1996); Change to J magnum frame and cylinder for all fixed sight 2" frames in 357 Mag; begin shipments in blue plastic case.
    I believe that's the most I've evr typed at one time. Please don't ask for the changes all the way to 60-18."

  6. #6
    Site Moderator
    Member #
    18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central, NH
    Posts
    5,663
    Liked
    418 times

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today...confused

    Very interesting. Just talking out loud here but let's see what we can come up with.

    The serial number dates it to early 1989.

    The -3's were introduced in 1988 and the 60-6Ladysmith in 1989. It could be that this was a left over -3 frame that they used the sideplate from a -6 Ladysmith.

    It could be that the sideplate was changed out later, for what ever reason. The bead blast finish could also be later but that is just a WAG.
    All Rights Reserved.

    http://www.geekologie.com/2009/06/11/pew%20pew.gif Pew Pew Girl is in Purgatory!

  7. #7
    Guest

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today...confused

    yea they didnt make too many of the glassbead finish i beleive.

  8. #8
    Site Moderator
    Member #
    355
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    China Spring TX
    Posts
    8,450
    Liked
    847 times

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today...confused

    That is a nice Ladysmith!
    U. S. debt explained...Let's say, you come home from work and find there has been a sewer backup in your neighborhood......and your home has sewage all the way up to your ceiling.
    What do you think you should do?
    Raise the ceiling or pump out the crap?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Member #
    470
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,310
    Liked
    54 times

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today...confused

    Congrats on a nice Ladysmith. For information about it or any other Smith, I recommend you invest in Standard Catalogue of Smith &Wesson, 3d Edition. You will find the info there a lot more accurate and authoritative than the internet -- unless you've cribbed the info off net but from the book, which could generate copyright problems.

    Bill

  10. #10
    Guest

    Re: I brought home a Ladysmith today...confused



 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. 586/686 "M" and an impertinent apparent "attitude"
    By mmitch in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-06-2011, 03:05 PM
  2. Please read the announcement on the home page.
    By Hunter in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-01-2010, 05:50 PM
  3. S&W Model 581 - "floating hand" & "Radius stud" advantages?
    By john-ranger in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2010, 11:36 PM
  4. Brought my 15-3 home! Pic added.
    By gscsa in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-24-2010, 05:22 AM
  5. Today's "Walk In".... What would you have paid?
    By Sebago Son in forum S&W Revolvers 1945 to Present
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-08-2009, 10:43 PM

Search tags for this page

lady smith 60-3

,

ladysmith 60-3

,
model 60-3 lady smith
,

p lady smith 60-3

,

s&w 60-18

,

s&w model 60-4

,
smith & wesson ladysmith model 60-8
,
smith and wesson 60-9
,
smith and wesson ladysmith 60-7
,
smith and wesson model 60-3 lady smith
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SmithandWessonForums.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson. We are an enthusiast site and fans of Smith & Wesson Firearms. To visit the official Smith & Wesson site, click here: Smith-Wesson.com.