CH has an opinion... and a nose, just like everyone else. His personal experiences are his own. He has a right to his own opinion. He does not have a right to his own facts. And, his personal experiences do not constitute anything more than his own experiences. Were his experiences the norm, S&W would not likely be the largest handgun producer in the world. If he feels that S&W has given Colt, Glock, etc. a raw deal, tough. S&W is not required to cut them any slack in a competitive environment wherein manufacturers routinely are informed by the developments/improvements, etc. made by other companies. Why... if memory serves me, Colt only was able to develop the 1873 Peacemaker after the White patent, owned by S&W, expired. Of course there are other examples.


8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

